Gemma 3 1B on a GTX 1060 3GB
A reproducible Local AI test on an older 3 GB Pascal GPU: model placement, observed GPU memory and three measured API generation runs.
Reproduced by E—DOCEO on September 18, 2026. Three API generation runs were recorded on the documented Windows test machine.
Result
In this test, Gemma 3 1B Q4_K_M ran entirely on the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB according to ollama ps, which reported 100% GPU. With an active context of 4096, three API generation runs measured 66.99, 67.14 and 66.13 tokens/second. The median generation throughput was 66.99 tok/s.
This result applies to the exact environment below. It is not a claim that every GTX 1060 3GB system, driver, context size or Ollama release will produce the same speed.
Test environment
| Component | Recorded configuration |
|---|---|
| Test date | September 18, 2026 |
| OS | Windows 10 Pro, build 19045 |
| CPU | AMD Ryzen 5 2600, 6 cores / 12 threads |
| RAM | 31.9 GB |
| GPU | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
| GPU memory | 3072 MiB |
| NVIDIA driver | 577.00 |
CUDA version reported by nvidia-smi |
12.9 |
| Driver model | WDDM |
| Ollama | 0.34.2 |
CUDA Version: 12.9 above is the compatibility version reported by nvidia-smi; this test did not independently establish that a CUDA Toolkit was installed.
Model configuration
ollama show gemma3:1b reported:
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Model | gemma3:1b |
Model ID observed in ollama ps |
8648f39daa8f |
| Architecture | gemma3 |
| Parameters | 999.89M |
| Quantization | Q4_K_M |
| Context length reported by model | 32768 |
Loaded size reported by ollama ps |
877 MB |
| Active context in test | 4096 |
| Processor placement | 100% GPU |
The distinction between the model's reported context capability and the 4096 active context matters: memory and performance can change when context settings change.
Method
The Windows installation was first checked layer by layer: Ollama version, empty local model list, local /api/tags response, model download, CLI inference, ollama ps, and nvidia-smi. The benchmark then used Ollama's local POST /api/generate endpoint with stream: false, temperature: 0 and num_ctx: 4096.
The prompt was kept identical:
Explain in about 150 words what a local large language model is and give three practical reasons for running one locally.Generation throughput is calculated from Ollama's returned eval_count and eval_duration:
generation tok/s = eval_count / (eval_duration / 1e9)Ollama documents eval_count as the number of generated output tokens and eval_duration as token-generation time in nanoseconds. This makes the measurement independent of a hand-operated stopwatch.
Three generation runs
| Run | Prompt tokens | Output tokens | Generation | Total request |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35 | 195 | 66.99 tok/s | 3.072 s |
| 2 | 35 | 192 | 67.14 tok/s | 2.904 s |
| 3 | 35 | 192 | 66.13 tok/s | 2.943 s |
| Median | — | — | 66.99 tok/s | 2.943 s |
The maximum-to-minimum spread in generation throughput was about 1.5%. That is useful evidence of short-run consistency, but three runs are still a small sample.
Prompt-processing rates were 281.87, 989.09 and 1089.90 tok/s. We do not use those values as the headline benchmark: the prompt contained only 35 tokens and the first request occurred under a different runtime/cache state, making that comparison less useful.
Observed GPU memory
nvidia-smi snapshots showed:
| State | Total GPU memory in use |
|---|---|
| Baseline before model load | 626 MiB / 3072 MiB |
| Model loaded | 1574 MiB / 3072 MiB |
| After benchmark | 1624 MiB / 3072 MiB |
| Observed baseline → post-benchmark delta | +998 MiB |
This is deliberately labelled observed GPU memory, not “the model requires 998 MiB of VRAM.” Under Windows/WDDM, nvidia-smi was reporting aggregate GPU memory while the desktop and other applications were also active. The snapshots establish system-level memory use around this test, not an isolated per-model allocation.
The post-benchmark nvidia-smi process list did show llama-server.exe as a compute process, while ollama ps independently reported 100% GPU.
Reproduce the benchmark
After installing Ollama and downloading gemma3:1b, this PowerShell request reproduces the benchmark configuration:
$body = @{
model = "gemma3:1b"
prompt = "Explain in about 150 words what a local large language model is and give three practical reasons for running one locally."
stream = $false
options = @{
temperature = 0
num_ctx = 4096
}
} | ConvertTo-Json
$r = Invoke-RestMethod -Method Post
-Uri http://localhost:11434/api/generate -ContentType "application/json"
-Body $body
[math]::Round($r.eval_count / ($r.eval_duration / 1e9), 2)
Record the runtime at the same time:
ollama ps
nvidia-smi
ollama show gemma3:1bFor a comparable result, keep the model tag, context, prompt and generation settings unchanged and record your Ollama and driver versions.
Limitations
This is a single-machine test, not a GPU-wide performance guarantee. It used one model, one quantization, a 4096 active context and a short fixed prompt. Windows desktop applications were running during the VRAM snapshots. Only three measured generation runs were used for the median.
The test demonstrates that this specific GTX 1060 3GB system could load the tested Gemma 3 1B configuration fully on GPU and generate at the recorded speed. It does not establish performance for larger context windows, other Gemma tags, other quantizations, different GTX 1060 cards or future Ollama versions.